Zambrano v. Cellco Partnership
| Eduwiges Zambrano |
| Cellco Partnership, Brian Pearson and Albert Salazar |
| 2:2011cv00507 |
| February 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 07/12/11; Initial Disclosures due by 7/12/2011; Discovery due by 3/15/2012; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 4/16/2012; Dispositive Motions shall be heard no lat er than 8/22/2012; Joint Pretrial Conference Statement due by 9/19/2012; Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/10/2012 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Trial Briefs due by 11/19/2012; Jury Trial set for 12/3/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. ORDER to SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiffs counsel shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned $250.00 for his failure to appear as ordered within 14 days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/4/11 ORDERING that Defendants' MOTION TO DISMISS 5 is GRANTED and defendants Pearson and Salazar are DISMISSED from this action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
