Martel v. Cadjew et al
Plaintiff: Richard Martel
Defendant: Frank Cadjew and Julie Cadjew
Case Number: 2:2011cv00509
Filed: February 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Placer
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/16/12; On April 11, 2012, the United States filed a Notice of Related Case in the above-captioned actions. Because the earlier action, Martel v. Cadjew, 2:11-cv-00509-JAM-EFB (PS), is now closed and the assignment of the two actions to a single judge is not likely to effect a savings of judicial effort or other economies, the actions will not be reassigned, as contemplated by Local Rule 123. SO ORDERED.(Matson, R)
March 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STIPULATION and ORDER 39 for Dismissal signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/5/2012. Parties agree to dismiss action with prejudice as to all defendants. (Marciel, M)
January 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/30/2012 DENYING, without prejudice, 33 Motion to Compel; VACATING the Motion Hearing scheduled for 2/1/2012; DIRECTING parties to confer in an effort to resolve this dispute without court intervention. (Michel, G)
December 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/1/11 ORDERING that the defendants' 23 Motion to Set Aside 21 Clerk's Entry of Default is GRANTED; defendants' 22 Answer to Amended Complaint is deemed effective and the plaintiff's 25 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. (Manzer, C)
September 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/20/2011 ORDERING 9 that defendants' motion to strike plaintiff's references to Doe defendants in plaintiff's first amended complaint is GRANTED. The remainder of defendants' motion to strike, is DENIED. (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martel v. Cadjew et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Martel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Cadjew
Represented By: Andrew M. Steinheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julie Cadjew
Represented By: Andrew M. Steinheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?