Kramer v. Freedom Capital Mortgage et al
| Charlene Kramer |
| Freedom Capital Mortgage, World Savings Bank, FSB, Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, Golden West Savings, Cal-Western Reconveyance and Wells Fargo, N.A. |
| 2:2011cv00513 |
| February 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/4/11 ORDERING the hearing on the Moving Defendants' motions to dismiss and strike plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. Nos. 5, 6), which are presently set for April 14, 2011, is continued until May 19, 2011; Plaintiff shall file written oppositions to the motion to dismiss and motion to strike, or statements of non-opposition thereto, on or before April 14, 2011. Plaintiff's failure to file written oppositions will be deemed statement s of non-opposition to the pending motions and consent to the granting of the motion to dismiss and motion to strike, and shall constitute an additional ground for the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including a recommendation that plaintiff's case be involuntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); The Moving Defendants may file written replies to plaintiff's oppositions, if any, on or before May 5, 2011.(Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
