Hughes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Plaintiff: Bernard Hughes
Defendant: D. Foston, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, R.J. Rackley, J. Daniels and S. Wright
Case Number: 2:2011cv00530
Filed: February 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/27/14 RECOMMENDING that 43 MOTION to DISMISS be granted; and this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/3/2013 ORDERING that, within 14 days, defedant Dr. Malet shall pay to the USM the sum of $241.28, unless within that time defendant files a written statement showing good cause for his failure to waive service; the court does not intend to extend this fourteen day period; and the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on the USM. (cc: USM)(Yin, K)
November 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/13/13 ordering that within 14 days from the date of service of this order, counsel for defendants Street, Fong and Awatani shall inform the court whether the Attorney General's Office also intends to represent defendant Malet and whether defendant Malet will join in the pending motion to dismiss. (Plummer, M)
October 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/30/13 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition to that motion.(Dillon, M)
July 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/2/13 ORDERING that defendant Lawrence Fong is dismissed from this action.(Dillon, M)
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/7/13 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motion to modify the courts prior orders 29 is GRANTED; Plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief 30 is DENIED; Within 14 days from the service of this order, plaintiff shall file the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and a USM-285 form for defendant Lawrence Fong and the Clerk of the Court is directed to provide five copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed July 11, 2011, when the court issues a subsequent order directing the U.S. Marshall to serve process on the defendants. In addition, the Clerk of the Court is directed to provide plaintiff with one USM-285 form with this order.(Dillon, M)
November 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/19/2012 GRANTING plaintiff's 25 motion for an extension of time; the Clerk to re-serve plaintiff the court's 10/16/12 order along with the service documents; plaintiff has 30 days to submit the Notice of Submission with the necessary documents for service. (Yin, K)
June 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/22/11 ordering plaintiff's 03/25/11 application to proceed in forma pauperis 13 is granted. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. All fees shall be paid in accordance with the court's CDC order filed concurrently herewith. Plaintiff's 03/23/11 motion for acceptance of the in forma pauperis application 12 is denied as unnecessary. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff's 02/25/11 motion for a preliminary injunction 3 is denied. Plaintiff's 02/25/11 motion for copying services 5 is denied. Plaintiff' ;s motions for appointment of counsel 10 and 16 are denied. Plaintiff's 04/18/11 motion for emergency relief 17 is denied. Plaintiff's 04/18/11 motion to file a supplemental complaint 18 is denied as moot. Plaintiff's 04/31/ 11 motion for medical records 20 is denied. The court will not entertain any further motions by plaintiff until the court has had an opportunity to screen any amended complaint plaintiff elects to file in response to this order and has determined that it states cognizable claims. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff the court's form complaint for a 1983 action. (Plummer, M)
March 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/9/11 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court and a certified cop y of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; [s] Motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hughes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Foston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R.J. Rackley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Daniels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernard Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?