Shapiro v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Gennady Shapiro |
Verdugo Trustee Service Corporation, Citibank, N.A., Recontrust Company, N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Bank of America, N.A. and PRLAP, Inc. |
2:2011cv00576 |
March 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Placer |
Craig M. Kellison |
John A. Mendez |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/29/12 GRANTING 44 Motion to Dismiss in its entirety without leave to amend. PRLAP, Inc., Recontrust Company, N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Bank of America, N.A. are DISMISSED from this lawsuit. Defendants' motion to strike is DENIED as moot. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 41 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/12/11 ORDERING defendants Citibank, N.A. and Verdugo Trustee Service Corporation are terminated. (Matson, R) |
Filing 40 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/12/2011 ORDERING 16 that Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; If Plaintiff wishes to file an Amended Complaint that is in accordance with this Order, it must be filed within twenty (20) days. Otherwise, Plaintiff should file a notice of dismissal. (Reader, L) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/12/11: Defendants' deadline to file a responsive pleading to plaintiff's complaint shall be extended to May 31, 2011. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.