United States v. Prusa et al
| United States |
| Jiri V. Prusa and Elany A. Prusa |
| 2:2011cv00830 |
| March 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| William B. Shubb |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 06/27/11 ORDERING that case number: 2:09-cv-0601 WBS KJN & 2:11-cv-0830 WBS KJN are substantively consolidated for all purposes. All further filings shall be in 2:09-CV-00601. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/11/11 ORDERING that the actions USA v. Prusa et al., 2:09-00601 WBS KJN and USA v. Prusa et al., 2:11-00830 MCE GGH, are deemed related; and USA v. Prusa et al., 2:11-00830 MCE GGH, shall be reassigned to t he Honorable WILLIAM B. SHUBB and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all further proceedings. Any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as USA v. Prusa et al., 2:11-00830 WBS KJN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriated adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
