Leopold v. Nangalama
Plaintiff: Carl Leopold
Defendant: A. Nangalama
Case Number: 2:2011cv00846
Filed: March 29, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/20/13 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action to a United States District Judge; and it is RECOMMENDED that Defendants July 25, 20 12 motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 21 ) be granted; Plaintiffs October 19, 2012 cross-motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 28 ) be denied; and Plaintiffs November 19, 2012 motion for temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 32 ) be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
January 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/23/13 ORDERING that within 15 days from the date of this order the parties shall file evidence of medical care provided to plaintiff for his lower back pain, if any, from April 1, 2009 until the time of plaintiffs transfer to CSP-Solano. Within fifteen days from the date of this order defendants shall file and serve a response to plaintiffs November 19, 2012 motion for temporary restraining order.(Dillon, M)
May 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 5/2/12 ORDERING that within 10 days from the date of this order defendants shall file and serve a response to plaintiffs April 30, 2012 motion; and plaintiffs reply, if any, shall be filed and served not later than ten days thereafter.(Dillon, M)
August 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Carl Leopold signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/18/11. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and copy of the IFP on CDC and financial. (cc Financial)(Matson, R)
June 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 06/20/11 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
May 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/29/11 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leopold v. Nangalama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carl Leopold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Nangalama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?