Klev v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Rhonda Klev |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2011cv00863 |
| March 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/3/2013 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of SEVEN THOUSAND, FIVE-HUNDRED DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($7,500.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/23/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment 18] is GRANTED in part pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner's Cross MOTION for Summary Ju dgment 25 is DENIED, and this matter is REMANDED for further findings in accordance with this order. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment for plaintiff. Given the satisfactory showing made in the Declaration of Bess M. Brewer 17 , the 11/23/11 order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution is discharged. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/14/2012 GRANTING Request for 30-Day Extension of Time. Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment due by 4/9/2012. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/21/2012 GRANTING a 30-Day Extension of time for Defendant to file a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Motion to be filed by 3/9/2012. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/17/12 ORDERING that the Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to file his cross-motion for summary judgment. The new due date will be 2/8/12.The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/23/11 ORDERING that the plaintiff show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/29/2011 re 14 ORDERING that the Plaintiff's time to file his summary judgment is hereby EXTENDED from September 26, 2011 to November15, 2011. (Duong, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Klev v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rhonda Klev | |
| Represented By: | Bess M. Brewer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
