Espinoza v. Watts et al
| Devin Espinoza |
| Harrell Watts and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 2:2011cv00929 |
| April 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| John F. Moulds |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/13/15 denying 41 Motion for Reconsideration. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/22/14 ordering that the petition is denied. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/31/14: The Clerk of the Court shall substitute Claude Maye, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary Leavenworth, as the respondent. 22 Motion for leave to amend petition is granted. Request to s trike or deny respondent's opposition 28 is denied. Motion for judgment on the pleadings 31 is denied as unnecessary. Motion for a status conference 32 is denied as unnecessary. Respondent is directed to file an answer or a motion to d ismiss within thirty days from the date of this order. Traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondents' answer is filed; an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of service of the motion to dismiss. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
