North Sacramento Land Company et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
| North Sacramento Land Company, Levee District 1, Reclamation District 784, Sacramento Valley Landowners Association, Butte County Farm Bureau, Solano County Farm Bureau and Yolo County Farm Bureau |
| United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Ken Salazar, Rowan W. Gould and Ren Lohoefener |
| 2:2011cv00943 |
| April 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Environmental Matters |
| 16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/17/11: This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/30/2011 re 18 ORDERING that the case is STAYED and that the case schedule be suspended until October 14, 2011, by which date the parties will either notify the Court that a settlement on attorneys' fees has been reached, or file with the Court a proposed briefing schedule for any attorneys' fee motions. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/15/2011 ORDERING that the schedule is adjusted as follows: administrative record to be filed 8/31/2011; motions to supplement the record to be filed 9/30/2011; opposition to motions to supplem ent record to be filed by 10/21/2011; replies to motions to supplement record to be filed by 11/4/2011. If Pltfs file a motion to supplement administrative record, the Parties will file a proposed briefing schedule within 10 days after the Court acts on that motion. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/13/2011 re 12 ORDERING that the court ADOPTS the schedule for the case is follows: Filing Deadline of Administrative Record 8/12/2011 ; Motion to Supplement Administrative Record ddl 9/9/11; Opposition ddl 9/30/11; Reply ddl 10/14/11; Motion for Summary Judgment ddl 10/31/2011; opposition/cross motion ddl 11/18/11; plt's opposition to cross motion and reply ddl 12/2/11; reply to cross motion ddl 12/16/11. If there are motions to supplement the record, the Parties will file a proposed briefing schedule within 10 days after the Court acts on those motions.(Duong, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
