United States of America v. Approximately $658,830.00 in U.S. Currency
United States of America |
Approximately $658,830.00 in U.S. Currency |
Robert D. Gibson |
Approximately $658,830.00 in U.S. Currency |
United States of America and United Parcel Service |
Robert D. Gibson |
Robert D. Gibson |
2:2011cv00967 |
April 11, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kendall J. Newman |
Morrison C. England |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 121 FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/15/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 112 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/25/2012 ORDERING that Mr. Gibson's 109 Motion for appointment of limited copy service aid from Federal Public Defender's Office and 110 Request for Judicial Notice are DENIED AS MOOT. (Zignago, K.) Modified on 9/26/2012 (Zignago, K.). |
Filing 111 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/24/12 ADOPTING IN FULL 101 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 77 Motion to Strike or alternatively for summary judgment; DENYING 104 ; DISMISSING AS MOOT 65 , 68 , 75 , 87 , 91 , 100 , 103 , and 106 . (Meuleman, A) Modified on 9/25/2012 (Meuleman, A). |
Filing 101 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/3/12 recommending that this court grant the government's Motion to Strike 77 . F&R referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 97 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/22/12: This court's order (Dkt. No. 94) granting Claimant Robert Gibson's an extension of time until July 10, 2012 to file and serve his single amended opposition is reaffirmed. Plaintiff may, but is not required to, file a reply brief with seven days from the latter of: (1) the date Mr. Gibson files a further amended opposition; or (2) July 10, 2012. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 92 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/23/2012 ORDERING Mr. Gibson to file a single Amended Opposition within 21 days, to the 77 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff may file a Reply Brief within 7 days after the Amended Opposition is filed. (Michel, G) |
Filing 85 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/16/12 ORDERING that Gibson's deadline to file a written opposition or statement of non-oppositionto plaintiff's motion to stay 78 is hereby extended, and Gibson shall file hisopposit ion or statement of non-opposition to plaintiff's motion to stay by no later than 3/9/12. Plaintiff may, but is not required to, file a reply brief within seven days after Gibson files his objection, if any. However, the court may resolve the m otion to stay prior to the filing of such a reply brief; The court shall enter a briefing schedule on the various other pending motions following final resolution of the motion to stay; The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the litigation coordinator at Salinas Valley State Prison, P.O. Box 1020, Soledad, CA 93960, to ensure timelydelivery to prisoner Robert D. Gibson, #E-09929. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 81 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/6/12 PROVISIONALLY GRANTING 78 Motion to Stay. Gibson shall file a written opposition to the motion to stay, or a statement of non-opposition, within 21 days of the entry of this order. Plaint iff may, but is not required to, file a reply brief within 7 days after Gibson files his objection, if any. However, the court may resolve the motion to stay prior to the filing of such a reply brief. The Court shall enter a briefing schedule on the various motions following final resolution of the motion to stay. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on the litigation coordinator at Salinas Valley State Prison to ensure timely delivery to prisoner Robert D. Givson, #E-09929. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 72 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/31/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 45 motion to strike the claim and answer of claimant Robert D.Gibson is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Mr. Gibson's claim and answer are not str icken. Mr. Gibson shall respond to plaintiff's special interrogatories within 21 days of service of this order. The government shall file a status update within 45 days of the date of this order notifying the court whether Mr. Gibson responded t o the interrogatories. The government's obligation to respond to Mr. Gibson's pending discovery requests is STAYED until 21 days after Mr. Gibson serves the government with responses to the government's special interrogatories. Claimant Robert D. Gibson's 18 , 23 , 30 , 37 , 47 , 48 , 52 , and 70 are DENIED without prejudice. Claimant Robert D. Gibson's 49 , 53 , 57 , and 66 motions to suppress are DENIED without prejudice.(Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 51 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/14/11 VACATING Motion Hearing scheduled for 8/4/2011. Reply, if any, to the opposition due by 7/28/2011. (Michel, G) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR PUBLICATION signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 04/14/11. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/12/2011 ORDERING that the Clerk for USDC EDCA, shall issue a Warrant for Arrest of Articles In Rem for the defendant currency. WRIT ISSUED(Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.