Pena v. Cate
Petitioner: Melvin Richard Pena
Respondent: Matthew Cate
Case Number: 2:2011cv01003
Filed: April 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 9/13/13 ORDERING that the Motion for Appointment of Counsel 46 is DENIED without prejudice to renewing the motion before the Court of Appeals. (Becknal, R)
August 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 8/6/13 DISMISSING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
February 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 2/27/13 ORDERING that the Motion for Appointment of Counsel 39 is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Petitioner is granted until 3/30/13, within which to file his reply to Respondent's answer. (Becknal, R)
January 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 1/9/2013 ORDERING that the 36 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
November 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 11/28/2012 DENYING 26 Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel; GRANTING 29 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of time; and Petitioner's time to respond to the answer is EXTENDED to 12/28/2012. (Reader, L)
September 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 9/11/12 DENYING without prejudice 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
June 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 06/24/11. Petitioner shall show cause within 30 days of the date of this order why the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus shall not be dismissed for violating the limitations period of 28 USC 2244(d). (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pena v. Cate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Melvin Richard Pena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Cate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?