Levitoff v. Vilsack et al
| Kristine Levitoff |
| Thomas J Vilsack and Department of Agriculture |
| 2:2011cv01149 |
| April 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Plumas |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/18/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/27/13 GRANTING additional time to file dismissal documents. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER 17 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/29/12 ORDERING that the scheduling order 14 is modified as follows: Plaintiff's Expert Witness Disclosure due 3/1/2013; Defendant's Expert Witness Disclosure due 3/29/2013; Supplemental/Rebuttal Expert Witnesses due 4/12/2013; Joint Mid-Litigation Statement due 4/26/2013; and Discovery due 5/15/2013. All other dates of the scheduling order 14 remain the same. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/30/11: Defendant Thomas J. Vilsack, may have an extension of time to respond to 9 plaintiff's first amended complaint from December 5, 2011 to and including December 23, 2011. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
