Dela Cruz et al v. Yuan et al
| Victor A. Dela Cruz and Mary M. Dela Cruz |
| JP Morgan Chase, Nation Association, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, California Reconveyance Company, Edward Py-Jen Yuan, Imperial Development Inc., Washington Mutual Bank and Federal Deposit Insurance Company |
| FDIC as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank |
| 2:2011cv01176 |
| May 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Banks and Banking |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/24/12 ORDERING that Palintiffs' claims against FDIC are DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Further, the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of FDIC and remand the case to the Superior Court of California in the County of Sacramento from which it was removed. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/15/2012 GRANTING 9 Motion to Dismiss. This dismissal is without prejudice and plaintiffs are GRANTED 5 court days leave from the date on which this order is filed to file an amended complaint. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 11/21/11 ORDERING that Defendants Edward Py Jen Yuan dba Imperial Mortgage and Imperial Development Inc. are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 11/7/2011 CONTINUING Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference until 2/27/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. Joint Status Report due 14 days prior to the 2/27/2012 hearing date. To avoid dismissal, Plaintiffs shall file proof of service for defendants Edward Py-Yen Yuan dba Imperial Mortgage and Imperial Development Inc. or a sufficient explanation why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)s prescribed service period by 11/18/2011. (Michel, G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
