Currier v. Stryker Corporation et al
| Travis J. Currier |
| Stryker Corporation and Stryker Orthopaedics |
| 2:2011cv01203 |
| May 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/25/2013 DISMISSING this action, with prejudice, pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
48
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/11/2013 re: 47 Stipulation and Proposed Order; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 5/14/2013., Discovery due by 7/8/2013, Dispositive Motions filed by 8/28/2013, Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/25/2013 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez, Jury Trial set for 12/2/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
46
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/19/12 DISMISSING Stryker Orthopaedics, Howmedica Oesteonics Corp. and Stryker Corporation. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/13/2012 GRANTING defendants Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp (erroneously sued as Stryker Orthopaedics) 35 days, to 9/18/2012, to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's 39 Second Amended Complaint. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
41
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 07/11/12 ORDERING that the time for defendants Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp (erroneously sued as Stryker Orthopaedics) to answer, move, or otherwise respond to plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint is EXTENDED to 08/14/12. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATION and ORDER 37 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/31/12 ORDERING Plaintiff shall have until July 3, 2012 to amend his Second Amended Complaint as to the Parties as described in this Stipulation; All dispositive motions shall be filed by June 26, 2013; Hearing on such [dispositive] motions shall be on July 24, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.; All discovery shall be completed by May 7, 2013; The parties shall make expert witness disclosures by March 12, 2013; Supplemental disclosure and disclosure of any rebuttal experts shall be made by March 26, 2013; The final pre-trial conference be set for August 28, 2013 at 3:00 p.m.; and Jury trial in this matter be set for September 30, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. In addition, Parties respectfully request that any settlement conference be set for after April 1, 2013.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 03/26/12 ORDERING that the 28 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Defendants shall file their answer to the SAC within 20 days. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/12/11 ORDERING the motion to dismiss the first claim for relief for strict liability is GRANTED. The allegations of design defect are dismissed, with prejudice. Plaintiff is given leave to amend the allegati ons of manufacturing defect. The motion to dismiss the second claim for relief for negligence is DENIED. The motion to dismiss the third claim for relief for breach of warranty is GRANTED. The breach of warranty claim is dismissed, with prejudice. Plaintiff is ordered to file a Second Amended Complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/28/11 CONTINUING Rule 26(f) Status Report Deadine to 8/2/11. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
