Johnson v. Labonte et al
Scott N. Johnson |
Millenium Smoke Shop Corporation, Robin Giffin, II, Pet Xing, Inc. and Judith Daniels Labonte |
2:2011cv01251 |
May 9, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Frank C. Damrell |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 11/7/11 ORDERING that the 11/14/11 status (pretrial scheduling) conference is VACATED. All discovery shall be completed BY 2/22/2013. Designation of Expert Witnesses is d ue BY 9/21/2012, and rebuttal expert disclosure is due BY 10/22/2012. The last hearing date for a motion is 4/22/2013, commencing at 9:00 a.m. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 6/17/2013 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E . Burrell, Jr.. The parties' joint pretrial statement shall be filed no later than seven calendar days prior to the final pretrial conference. Trial is SET for 9/24/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/29/11; The defendant is granted an extension until 7/29/11 to respond or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint.(Matson, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.