Buckley v. High Desert State Prison et al
Plaintiff: Jules Buckley
Defendant: High Desert State Prison and A.E. Ritola
Case Number: 2:2011cv01310
Filed: May 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/16/15 ordering the Custodian to produce Jules Buckley via video conferencing on 09/10/15 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. The Custodian is ordered to notify the court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this writ on the Custodian and the court's Information Technology Department. (cc: I.T. Dept, Sacramento)(Plummer, M)
February 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/6/2015 ORDERING that the 36 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Defendant's 33 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. This matter is REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings consistent with this order. (Zignago, K.)
November 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/25/14 recommending that Defendant's motion for summary judgment 33 be granted in part and denied in part as follows: Defendant's motion for summary judgment on p laintiff's claim that he was exposed to unconstitutional prison working conditions be denied; Defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim that defendant was deliberately indifferent to his need for medical care be gran ted; and defendant's motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds be denied. This matter be referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings regarding plaintiff's prison working conditions claim. Motion for Summary Judgment 33 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/05/14 ordering that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. (Plummer, M)
October 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/9/13 denying 26 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
August 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/7/13 ORDERING that within 30 days from the service of this order, defendant shall file an answer to the amended complaint. Following the filing of defendants answer, the court shall issue a discovery and scheduling order.(Dillon, M)
August 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER DECLINING TO ADOPT 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/5/13. The 16 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED and this action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Manzer, C)
May 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/15/2013 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign this case to a District Judge; and RECOMMENDING that defendant's 16 motion to dismiss be granted; and this action be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. Assigned and Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 21 days. (Yin, K)
March 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/11/2013 ORDERING that, within 30 days, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss and shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for the failure to file a timely opposition. In the alternative, if plaintiff no longer wishes to proceed with this matter, he shall file a request to dismiss this action without prejudice pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a).(Yin, K)
November 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Jules Buckley signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/28/11. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buckley v. High Desert State Prison et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jules Buckley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: High Desert State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A.E. Ritola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?