Williams v. Technique Towing/Advanced Automotive/GB7 et al
| Joyce Williams |
| Technique Towing/Advanced Automotive/GB7, Samuel Gramajo, Jose Noe and Mary Gramajo |
| 2:2011cv01346 |
| May 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/26/12 RECOMMENDING that the 3 Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days; referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/11/11 ORDERING Plaintiff shall submit, within twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this order, either a completed application and affidavit in support of her request to proceed in forma paup eris on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; The complaint is dismissed for the reasons discussed above, with leave to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight (28) days from the date of service of this Order. Failure to file an amended complaint will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
