Pavey et al v. Recontrust Company N.A.
| Brian M. Pavey and Janelle Pavey |
| Recontrust Company N.A. |
| 2:2011cv01477 |
| June 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/6/2012 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 36 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/8/2012 ORDERING 30 Plaintiffs' "1st [Amended] Complaint," "Request for Initial Disclosures," "Objection to Non-Judicial Decision Making," and "Objection to Oral Argument," are STRICKEN since judgment was entered in Defendant Recontrust Company, N.A.'s favor on 5/5/2012. This action is closed. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/2/2012. The 27 Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by Magistrate Judge Drozds analysis, except for recommendation that a ruling issue on defendants 16 Motion to Strike. Court has DECLINED to continue exercising supplemental jurisdiction over remaining state claims. The defendant's 17 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Clerk shall enter Judgment in favor of Recontrust Company, N.A. on Federal Credit Reporting Act claim. Further, state claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
27
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/10/2012 RECOMMENDING that the 16 Motion to Strike be denied, as moot; that the 17 Motion to Dismiss be granted in part; that the Plaintiffs' claim based on alleged vi olation of the FCRA 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. be dismissed with prejudice; that the court decline to exercise supplemental judgment over plaintiffs' state law claims; that the plaintiffs' state law claims be dismissed without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3); and that this action be closed. Motions referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/20/2011 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' 23 motion to file electronically is GRANTED, and plaintiffs shall register to file electronically forthwith.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/13/11 ORDERING that plaintiffs are granted twenty-one days from service of this order to file, in paper format, the declaration described in the text of this order, if they wish to agree to the court's requirements for electronic filing. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/26/11 ORDERING that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 10/7/11 is VACATED, and the parties are not required to file status reports. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/3/2011 ORDERING that a Status Conference is SET for 10/7/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Within fourtee n (14) days after plaintiffs are served with this order, plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this order upon the defendant. Within five (5) days after serving a copy of this order upon the defendant, plaintiffs shall file a certificate of service indic ating the date and manner of service of the order upon the defendant. Plaintiffs shall file and serve a status report on or before September 23, 2011, and defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before September 30, 2011. Plaintiffs are advised that failure to file a timely status report or failure toappear at the status conference in person or telephonically may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and as a sanction for failure to comply with court orders and applicable rules.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/2/11 DENYING 3 Motion for TRO. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
