Schmitz v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Dave Schmitz |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
2:2011cv01487 |
June 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER re DISPOSAL DOCUMENTS after notification of Settlement signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/1/2013. Court orders dispositional documents be filed no later than 21 days from effective date of Order. All Hearing dates set in this matter are hereby VACATED. Failure to comply may be grounds for imposition of sanctions on any all counsel or parties who contributed to violation. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 47 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/5/12: Plaintiff shall file any motion for class certification so that it shall be heard no later than 6/30/2013; All class certification discovery shall b e completed by 4/30/2013; All motions to compel such discovery must be scheduled such that the motions will be heard not later than 3/30/2013; All expert reports regarding class certification shall be disclosed and filed by 2/28/2013; All other aspects of the Court's 12/13/2011 Order shall remain in full force and affect. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 33 AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER re Use of Confidential Information signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/3/2011. (Duong, D) |
Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/20/11 ORDERING that either party may conduct up to 20 depositions without obtaining leave of court;either party may serve up to 45 interrogatories without obtaining leave of court; the 10/20/11 Discovery Conference is VACATED; Scheduling Conference SET for 12/12/11 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton w/ an updated status report due 14 days prior. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/18/11: Parties' October 17, 2011 request for entry of the proposed stipulated protective order is denied without prejudice 28 . (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Schmitz v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dave Schmitz | |
Represented By: | William A. Kershaw |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.