Jones v. Swarthout
| Michael C. Jones |
| Gary Swarthout |
| 2:2011cv01497 |
| June 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/4/2014 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed; and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/30/2013 REFERRING this matter back to the magistrate judge to determine whether the petition should be (1) dismissed in its entirety based on the unexhausted claim; (2) stayed to allow Petitioner to exhause state remedies for his First Amended claim; (3) dismissed on the merits. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
11
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/17/12 recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed; and the clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/12/11 ORDERING that within 30 days from this order, petitioner shall show cause for his failure to exhaust state remedies with respect to the claims contained in his 10/28/11 amended petition or obtain from the respondent an express waiver of the exhaustion requirement. Petitioners failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/18/11 ordering petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. The clerk of the court shall send petitioner the court's form for application for writ of habeas corpus. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/13/11 ORDERING that within 30 days from the day this order is served, petitioner may submit either the filing fee or the IFP application. Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to petitioner a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Swarthout | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael C. Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Gary Swarthout | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
