Rhoads v. Unknown
Petitioner: William Luther Rhoads
Respondent: Unknown
Case Number: 2:2011cv01507
Filed: June 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Napa
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/25/14 denying 13 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Documents filed by petitioner since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Plummer, M)
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/16/12 ordering this petition for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed on 09/15/11. Petitioner is advised that documents filed petitioner since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Plummer, M)
July 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/21/11 ORDERING that petitioner is GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis; The Clerk of the Court is directed to: Assign a district judge to this case; Inser t an image of page six from the original petition (dkt. no. 1 at 6) into the first amended petition as docket no. 3 at 6; and Serve a copy of these findings and recommendations together with a copy of the petition filed in the instant case on the Attorney General of the State of California; and it is RECOMMENDED that petitioners application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (cc Michael Farrell). (Dillon, M)
June 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/23/11 ORDERING that Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rhoads v. Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Luther Rhoads
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?