Lavery-Petrash v. Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital, et al.,
Nora Lavery-Petrash |
Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital, James (Jim) Heard, David Witthaus, Arthur Dewson and Annalise O'Connor |
2:2011cv01520 |
June 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
Garland E. Burrell |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 109 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/11/15 recommending that 85 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and this action be closed. F&R referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Objections to F&R due Within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 108 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/22/2015 ORDERING that defendant's 97 renewed motion to strike is DENIED without prejudice to renewal if appropriate following the filing of the assigned District Judge's order address ing defendant's submitted motion for summary judgment. In the event this matter remains scheduled for pretrial conference following disposition of the pending motion for summary judgment, the undersigned intends to schedule a telephonic status conference to address any outstanding matters, including possible resolution of any remaining dispute regarding the report of plaintiffs expert or the deposition of that expert. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 95 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/7/2015 GRANTING 94 Motion for Electronic Case Filing. (Michel, G.) |
Filing 93 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/23/2015 DENYING 86 Motion to Strike without prejudice to renewal at a later date if appropriate. Plaintiff shall provide defendant with an expert witness report within 14 days of the date of this order. Defendant's 85 Motion for Summary Judgment is taken under submission. (Donati, J) |
Filing 77 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/8/14 ORDERING Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 6/6/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd; plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or b efore 5/23/14 and defendants shall file and serve a status report on or before 5/30/14. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear at the status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 75 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/17/2014 ADOPTING IN FULL 73 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 65 Motion to Dismiss as to the Fourth Amended Complaints claims of age-based discrimination and retaliation against Defendant Dig nity Health; GRANTING 65 Motion to Dismiss as to the Fourth Amended Complaints hostile work environment harassment and negligence claims against all defendants and as to the claims of age-based discrimination and retaliation against the individual defendants; DISMISSING Defendants Annalise O'Connor, David Witthaus, Arthur Dewson and James Heard; DENYING the plaintiff further leave to amend; ORDERING Defendant Dignity Health to file within 21 days, an answer to the surviving claims alleged in the Fourth Amended Complaint. (Michel, G) |
Filing 73 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/28/2014 RECOMMENDING that the 65 Motion to Dismiss be denied as to the Fourth Amended Complaint's claim of age-based discrimination and retaliation against Defendant Di gnity Health; RECOMMENDING that the 65 Motion to Dismiss be granted as to the Fourth Amended Complaint's hostile work environment harassment and negligence claims against all defendants and as to the claims of age-based discrimination and reta liation against the individual defendants; RECOMMENDING that the individual defendants be dismissed from this action; RECOMMENDING that the plaintiff not be granted further leave to amend; RECOMMENDING that Defendant Dignity Health be directed to ans wer the Fourth Amended Complaint within twenty-one (21) days of any order adopting these Findings and Recommendations; REFERRING this matter to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; ORDERING that any objections be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Michel, G) |
Filing 71 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/21/13. The 65 Motion to Dismiss is taken under submission. The dates set by the previously issued scheduling order are hereby VACATED. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 62 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/6/2013 ORDERING 59 Ms Lapin's request for "oral argument" is unnecessary, and no hearing is scheduled. (Reader, L) |
Filing 59 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE; IN PRO PER REFERRAL signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/28/13 ORDERING Ms. Lapin is Ordered to Show Cause ("OSC") in a writing to be filed no later than 6/3/13, why she should not be sanctioned five hundred dol lars ($500.00) for failing to comply with Local Rules 180(c) and 184(b). The written response shall state whether a hearing is requested on the OSC. If a hearing is requested, it will be held on 6/10/13. Further, under these circumstances, it i s apparent that Plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona. Future service on Plaintiff shall be as follows: Nora Lavery-Petrash, 13995 Bear Run Road, Nevada City, CA 95959. Also, since Plaintiff is proceeding in pro per, this case is referred to the assigned magistrate judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21). (Becknal, R) |
Filing 50 ORDER granting 40 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 9/5/12. Further, Plaintiff is GRANTED 10 days from date on which this order is filed to file a Third Amended Complaint in which she addresses the deficiencies in any dismissed claim. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 37 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/26/12 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 27 Motion to Dismiss; dfts Dewsen and Dignity Health's Rule 12(e) motion is DENIED; pltf is granted 10 days to file a second amended complaint. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/12/2011 ORDERING that Defendants' 8 motion to dismiss Lavery-Petrash's Complaint is granted in part and denied in part.Lavery-Petrash is granted ten (10) days from the date on which this order is filed to file a First Amended Complaint in which she addresses the deficiencies in any claim not dismissed with prejudice. Further, Lavery-Petrash is notified that this action may be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) if she fails to file an amended Complaint within the prescribed time period.(Duong, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.