Williams v. City of Sacramento Police Department et al
| Codie Williams |
| C Faria, City of Sacramento Police Department, Kurt Wilhite and B Ellis |
| 2:2011cv01538 |
| June 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/30/12; this case is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Codie Williams signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/05/12. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/20/11 ORDERING that pltf shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint within 30 days; the Clerk of the court is directed to send pltf IFP Form. (Michel, G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
