Hundal v. Ochoa et al
| Kanwaljit Singh Hundal |
| J. Tim Ochoa and Matthew Cate |
| 2:2011cv01571 |
| June 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Riverside |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 10/2/13 DENYING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. The Clerk of the Court is to ENTER judgment accordingly. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 9/4/2013 ORDERING Respondent to lodge with this Court, by 10/21/2013, Exhibits Six and Seven of Hundal's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed with the San Joaquin County Superior Court on December 10, 2008; ORDERING Petitioner Hundal to lodge with this Court, by 10/21/2013, the clinical psychology report prepared by Dr. Howells. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/25/11 GRANTING 13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Respondent shall file and serve a responsive pleading on or before 9/22/11. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/20/11 ORDERING that petitioner shall submit the $5.00 filing fee or request to proceed IFP within 30 days; the clerk is directed to send the petitioner an IFP form. (Michel, G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
