Brooks v. McDonald
| Pharaoh E. Brooks |
| M. McDonald |
| 2:2011cv01637 |
| June 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 6/29/16 ORDERING that Brooks' filing at Docket No. 44 will be construed as a timely-filed notice of appeal. IS IT FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Clerk of Court is directed to transfer Brooks' Request for a Certificate of Appealability at Docket No. 44 to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 05/13/16 ORDERING that the 32 Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; Court DECLINES to issue COA. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/15/15 ordering respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition within 60 days from the date of this order. (See order for further details) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/01/15 ordering petitioner's request to lift the stay of this action 29 is granted. The clerk of the court is directed to reopen this case. Within 30 days of the date of service of this order, petitioner shall file a second amended petition containing all of his exhausted claims. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/1/12 DENYING 23 Motion to vacate the stay; Petitioner shall present any unexhausted claims to the California Supreme Court in a further state habeas corpus petition to be filed within 30 days if he has not done so already.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/3/2012 GRANTING 11 Motion for Stay and Abeyance; ORDERING Petitioner to present any unexhausted claims to the California Supreme Court in a further state habeas corpus petition within 30 days; STA YING this ACTION; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to administratively close the case; ORDERING Petitioner to file a Status Report on the first court day of each month; ORDERING Petitioner to file and serve a Motion to Lift the Stay along with a Proposed Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus containing only exhausted claims within 30 days of Petitioner's service of the California Supreme Courts order disposing of the state exhaustion petition. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/23/11 ORDERING that 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are VACATED; 2 Motion to Stay is DENIED as moot; Petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file a renewed motion for a stay and abeyance addressing the issues set forth above.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/1/11 ORDERING that 6 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; and Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. It is RECOMMENDED th at 2 MOTION to STAY be denied; and this matter be referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings on petitioners original petition for writ of habeas corpus; randomly assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/5/11: Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brooks v. McDonald | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Pharaoh E. Brooks | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: M. McDonald | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
