Ward v. Ives et al
Plaintiff: John C. Ward
Defendant: E. DeBruler, Ryan Binford, Richard Ives, Jay Salinas, Robert E. McFadden and Saroj Gulani
Case Number: 2:2011cv01657
Filed: June 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/6/2015 ORDERING that the 61 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full. This action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
November 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 61 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/17/14 recommending that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER ADOPTING 58 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/29/2014. Defendants' 44 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's FTCA and First Amendment claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from date Order is filed to submit a Third Amended Complaint. (Marciel, M)
September 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/4/2014 DENYING plaintiff's 41 motion to amend and 52 motion to compel, and GRANTING his 56 request to supplement his opposition to defendants&# 039; motion to dismiss; and RECOMMENDING that defendants' 44 motion to dismiss be granted; plaintiff's FTCA and First Amendment claims be dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice; plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim agains t defendants Salinas, Binford and Fieber be dismissed with leave to amend; and plaintiff be granted leave to file a third amended complaint, consistent with these findings and recommendations within 30 days of the filing of any order adopting these recommendations. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/3/13 ORDERING that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of no opposition.(Dillon, M)
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/20/13 ORDERING that plaintiffs request to dismiss defendant Gulani from this action is GRANTED; Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a third amended complaint 31 is denied; and defendants Binford, Fieber, and the United States may file their responsive pleading at the same time that a responsive pleading from defendant Salinas becomes due.(Dillon, M)
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/13/13 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall mail plaintiff two forms USM-285. Within 30 days from the date this order is served, plaintiff must submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents with completed forms USM-285 providing new instructions for service of process upon defendants Gulani and Salinas.(Dillon, M)
May 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER denying 27 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/13/13. (Plummer, M)
March 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER adopting in full 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 3/11/13. Defendant Ives is dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Kastilahn, A)
January 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/14/13 ORDERING plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis 16 is granted. Service is appropriate for defendants Salinas, Binford, Fieber, Gulani and the United States. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff 5 USM-285 forms, 1 summons, instruction sheet and a copy of the 09/12/12 amended complaint to be completed and returned within 30 days. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendant Ives be dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
August 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/28/12 ORDERING that Defendants Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ives and Debruler are dismissed. Within 30 days of service of this order, plaintiff may amend his complaint in accordance with this orde r. Service is appropriate for defendants Salinas, Binford, Fieber, and Gulani. If plaintiff wishes to have the United States Marshal serve the amended complaint on defendants Salinas, Binford, Fieber, and Gulani, he must file a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days from the date of this order. If plaintiff does not file such a request, or if the court denies any such request, plaintiff will be directed to proceed with service without the assistance of the United States Marshal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to plaintiff a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ward v. Ives et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. DeBruler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan Binford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Ives
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Salinas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert E. McFadden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Saroj Gulani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John C. Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?