Hicks v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Hicks v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Hicks v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Plaintiff:	Brian Hicks
Defendant:	Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Case Number:	2:2011cv01698
Filed:	June 22, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sutter
Presiding Judge:	Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge:	Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 5, 2012	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/5/12 ORDERING that the Court is in receipt of the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed by the parties on 1/27/12 12 . Based upon that Stipulation, and pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), this matter is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Motion to Withdraw as Counsel filed by the attorney for Plaintiff Brian Hicks 11 is DENIED as moot, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
October 18, 2011	Filing 10 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/17/11: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 11/8/2012. Discovery due by 9/7/2012. Dispositive Motions filed by 3/7/2013. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/16/2013 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. Jury Trial set for 7/8/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Kaminski, H)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 5, 2012

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/5/12 ORDERING that the Court is in receipt of the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed by the parties on 1/27/12 12 . Based upon that Stipulation, and pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), this matter is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Motion to Withdraw as Counsel filed by the attorney for Plaintiff Brian Hicks 11 is DENIED as moot, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)

October 18, 2011

Filing 10 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/17/11: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 11/8/2012. Discovery due by 9/7/2012. Dispositive Motions filed by 3/7/2013. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/16/2013 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. Jury Trial set for 7/8/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Kaminski, H)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Hicks
Represented By:	Ryan Lee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?