Koepsell v. USAA, et al
| Patricia T Koepsell |
| USAA and USAA Federal Savings Bank |
| 2:2011cv01772 |
| July 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Mono |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/24/2012 ORDERING 30 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; this action is DISMISSED in its entirety, with prejudice, with each side to bear its own costs; the 7/9/2012 hearing is VACATED; and all other pending motions in this case are DENIED as MOOT. CASE CLOSED. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
23
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/13/11: Discovery due by 7/12/2012. Dispositive Motions filed by 9/12/2012. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/20/2012 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Jury Trial set for 3/12/2013 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/24/11 DENYING 9 Motion to Dismiss as moot. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/17/11: Hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss 9 which is currently set for August 29, 2011, is VACATED. Plaintiff shall file her first amended complaint by August 22, 2011. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
