Schultz et al v. Krause et al
| Kirk Matthew Schultz, Clothes Line Fashions LLC and No Mow Yard Inc |
| Robin Meade, Jon Tate Namle, Jerry Jurgensen, William A Carrasco, Donnie Kearns, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Peter W Krause, David Letterman, Bonnie Reed, Stan Lemke, Barbara Grimm, Allied (PCRO) Wells Fargo & Company, Farm Credit East Aca, Allied Insurance Inc and Steve Rasmussen |
| 2:2011cv01796 |
| July 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Morrison C. England |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/6/2012 ORDERING The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to ADOPT the F & R's in full.Nationwide's # 16 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Nationwide's motion for a more definite statement is DENIED as MOOT; the action is DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
29
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/12/11 RECOMMENDING that Nationwide's motion to dismiss 16 be granted and Nationwide's motion for a more definite statement be denied as moot; The action be dismissed with prejudice; and The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England. Jr; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/8/11 ORDERING the hearing on the 16 Motion is VACATED and the motions are SUBMITTED on the record. The 22 Plaintiff Motion for Extension of time is DENIED without prejudice as moot. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/3/11 DENYING without prejudice 15 19 , 20 Motions for discovery and REVOKING plaintiff's electronic filing/ECF privileges. The Clerk of Court shall take the necessary steps to cancel plaintiff's access to ECF. Plaintiff shall complete service of process on the defendants, or file an appropriate notice of dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) as to those defendants plaintiff intends to dismiss from the action, with in 28 days of service of this order. Plaintiff shall file a declaration of service for each defendant indicating that the defendant was properly served with process; plaintiff shall not notice/file any additional motions, and discovery in this matter is STAYED, until final resolution of defendant's motion to dismiss currently set for hearing on 12/15/11. Until such time, plaintiff is limited to filing one opposition to the motion to dismiss; declarations of service demonstrating service of process; and a notice of dismissal of any defendants plaintiff intends to dismiss from the action. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Meuleman, A) Modified on 11/3/2011 (Meuleman, A).
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/3/2011 ORDERING that Pltf's 6 Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Pltf's request to file their papers electronically is GRANTED. Pltf may file an amended complaint in accordance with Rule 15(a)(1). Pltfs' request to preserve evidence for review during trial is DENIED as premature. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
