Luciano v. United States of America, et al.,
Robert A Luciano, Jr. |
United States of America, United States Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, United States Forest Service, Tom Tidwell, Randy Moore, Alice B Carlton and Deb Bumpus |
2:2011cv01831 |
July 12, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kendall J. Newman |
Garland E. Burrell |
Other Statutory Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/6/14 ORDERING that Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment 38 is GRANTED and Plaintiff's MOTION 33 is DENIED. The Clerk is ordered to close this case. CASE CLOSED (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 76 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/15/2013 ORDERING The express statutory language and abundance of case law reviewing land exchange proposals necessitate the conclusion that Plaintiffs APA claims are judicially reviewable. Accordingly, this Court finds there IS subject matter jurisdiction.(Waggoner, D) |
Filing 63 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/28/13 ORDERING that a briefing is required and scheduled for 5/6/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.; each party shall file a brief no later than 4/15/13; replies due no later than 4/22/13; hearing as to 33 Motion for Summary Judgment and 38 Motion for Summary Judgment reset for 8/12/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 58 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/19/13 ORDERING that the United States' deadline for filing a reply to Plaintiff's opposition to 38 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT is EXTENDED to 3/25/13. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 31 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/19/12 ORDERING 27 Motion is stricken and 28 Ex Parte Motion is denied. (Matson, R) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/12/2012 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed no later than 1/14/2013. Defendants' Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed no later than 2/4/2013. Plaintiff's Reply and Opposition shall be filed no later than 2/25/2013. Defendants' Reply shall be filed no later than 3/18/2013. The hearing on the cross-motions for summary judgment shall be noticed for 4/8/2013, at 9:00 a.m. In the event the referenced cross-motions for summary judgment do not dispose of the case in its entirety, a further status conference is scheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on 6/24/2013. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 22 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/19/12: Plaintiff shall file a motion for an order authorizing discovery and/or to augment the administrative record no later than August 13, 2012. Status Conference RESET for 9/17/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/7/12 CONTINUING Status Conference set to 4/23/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A joint status report shall be filed 14 days prior to the hearing; ORDERING the United States to file and serve, if necessary, any additions to the Administrative Record on or before 4/16/12 and CONTINUING Motion Hearing re: 10 , 11 , and 12 Motions to 5/14/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Meuleman, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.