Johnson Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Gai Toi Johnson Williams |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2011cv01898 |
| July 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/24/12 RECOMMENDING that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecuteand the Clerk be directed to close the case. Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days; 1 case referred to Judge John A. Mendez. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/14/2012 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 3/5/2012 10 motion is GRANTED and the order and judgment are SET ASIDE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to REOPEN the case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to s end plaintiff a copy of the magistrate judge's 7/26/2011 order. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall comply with the magistrate judge's 7/26/2011 order. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this case. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/13/2011 REASSIGNING CASE to Judge John A. Mendez for all further proceedings. New Case Number: 2:11-CV-1898 JAM EFB PS. RECOMMENDING that this case be dismissed for failure to procecute and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after beings served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/19/11 ORDERING that, within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall comply with the court's June 26 order. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this case. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/25/2011; Clerk is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases; Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order o n the USM; plaintiff shall submit to the USM, w/i 14 days from date of this order, documents for service of process without prepayment of costs; USM to serve process not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (cc: USM by inter-office mailbox) (Waggoner, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gai Toi Johnson Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
