Burgos v. Long
Plaintiff: Richard Manuel Burgos
Defendant: Robert Long
Case Number: 2:2011cv01906
Filed: July 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 98 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/29/13 RECOMMENDING that defendants June 28, 2013 Motion for Summary Judgment 81 be granted in full; Plaintiffs April 12, 2013 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order [ 67] be denied; Plaintiffs September 12, 2013 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 89 be denied; Plaintiffs September 26, 2013 Motion for Sanctions and Protective Order 93 be denied; and Plaintiffs October 18, 2013 Motion to Supplement Newly Discovered Evidence 97 be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
September 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/9/2013 ORDERING that plaintiff's 65 motion to compel discovery is DENIED; plaintiff's 66 motion to compel discovery responses is DENIED; plaintiff's 82 motion for extens ion of time is GRANTED; plaintiff's 8/27/2013 opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment is DEEMED TIMELY FILED; defendants' 86 motion for extension of time is GRANTED; defendants shall file their reply on or before 9/17/2013; and plaintiff's 87 motion is DENIED. (Yin, K)
June 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/24/2013 ORDERING that the 70 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiff's 57 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
April 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER denying 58 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/22/13. (Plummer, M)
November 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/09/12 ordering within 20 days from the date of this order, defendant Long shall inform the court in writing whether any additional documents have been provided to plaintiff in response to request number 38 of plaintiff's first request for production of documents and if not, why not. Except as provided in paragraph 1 of this order, plaintiff's 05/04/12 motion to compel 37 is denied. Plaintiff's 06/01/12 motion to amend 40 is granted. The first amended complaint states a cognizable claim for relief against the following defendants: Robert C. Long, A.C. Valencia, Sheila B. Molles, C. Stauss, Ronald W. Cappel and Gary Swarthout. Within 20 days from the date of this ord er counsel for defendant Long shall inform the court in writing whether counsel will accept service of process on behalf of defendants Valencia, Molles, Stauss, Cappel and Swarthout. Defendant Long shall respond to the first amended complaint within 20 days from the date of this order or with defendants Valencia, Molles, Stauss, Cappel and Swarthout should his counsel accept service on behalf of said defendants. Defendant's 07/20/12 motion to vacate the deadline set for filing dispositive motions 45 is granted. The court will set new dates for discovery and filing dispositive motions by subsequent order. (Plummer, M)
June 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/14/2012 ORDERING that the 33 findings and recommendations filed 3/30/2012, are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's 10/3/2011 11 motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. Plaintiff's 12/1/2011 26 motion for preliminary injunction is denied. (Zignago, K.)
May 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 05/16/12 ordering that plaintiff is granted 20 days from the date of this order in which to file a motion for leave to amend the complaint or written consent signed by defendant Long. (Plummer, M)
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 3/29/12; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiff's December 1, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied; Plaintiff's December 1, 2011 motion for sa nctions is denied; Plaintiff's December 1, 2011 motion to recuse the California Attorney General is denied; Plaintiff's December 19, 2011 motion for extension of time is granted; Plaintiff's December 27, 2011 reply is deemed timely fil ed; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: Plaintiff's October 3, 2011 motion for preliminary injunction be denied; and Plaintiff's December 1, 2011 motion for preliminary injunction be denied. These findings and recommendations are submitted t o the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned Objections to Magistrate Judges Findings and Recommendations. Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Courts order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(Matson, R)
November 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/22/2011 DENYING plaintiff's 19 request for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Richard Manuel Burgos signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/23/2011. $350.00 filing fee to be paid in accordance with this order. Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed IFP on CDC. (cc: Financial, CDC). (Michel, G)
July 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 7/28/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burgos v. Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Manuel Burgos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?