Feezor v. Staples, Inc. et al
| Lary Feezor |
| Staples, Inc. and KMV Properties, LLC |
| 2:2011cv01930 |
| July 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER 22 for Dismissal signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/23/2013. This case is DISMISSED, with prejudice, in its entirety. Clerk directed to CLOSE this action. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/7/12: Final Pretrial Conference RESET for 1/23/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. Jury Trial RESET for 3/24/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. Any evidentiary or procedural motions are to be filed by January 2, 2014. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER 16 signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/28/12; It is hereby ordered that the complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to defendant KMV Properties, LLC. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/28/11: STAPLES, INC. dba STAPLES # 0442, shall have an additional extension of twenty-eight (28) days to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
