Murzak et al v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. et al
Boris Murzak and Zinaida Murzak |
Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Marin Conveyancing Corporation, Recontrust Company, N.A., Residential Funding Company, LLC, BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP and Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. |
2:2011cv01952 |
July 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Garland E. Burrell |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/17/2011 recommending that defendants Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Marin Conveyancing Corporation, and Residential Funding Company, LLC be dismissed this action be closed; re 1 Notice of Removal referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell; Objection due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Duong, D) |
Filing 10 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/30/2011 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court shall RE-OPEN this case; ORDERING plaintiff to show cause, in writing, as to why defendants Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Marin Conveyancing Corporation, and Residential Funding Company, LLC, should not be dismissed for failure to comply with F.R.C.P. 4(m) within 14 days. (Michel, G) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.