United States of America v. Approximately $18,040.00 in U.S. Currency et al
| United States of America |
| Approximately $18,040.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $9,410.00 in U.S. Currency |
| 2:2011cv01964 |
| July 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Approximately $18,040.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $9,410.00 in U.S. Currency entered pursuant to Order signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/9/2011. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
14
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/4/11: Recommending that 13 MOTION for DEFAULT JUDGMENT be granted. F&R referred to Judge Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
5
APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR PUBLICATION signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/28/2011 ORDERING that plaintiff shall cause public notice of the action to be given in a newspaper or general circulation or on the official internet government forfeiture site.(Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER REGARDING CLERK'S ISSUANCE OF WARRANT FOR ARREST OF ARTICLES IN REM for the defendant currency signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/27/11. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
