Jones v. Jaffe et al
Henry A. Jones |
Jaffe and O'Neil |
2:2011cv02049 |
August 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/03/14 ORDERING that defendant's request for judicial notice [79-5] is granted. Also, RECOMMENDING that defenant's motion for summary judgment 79 be granted. This action be closed. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 79 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 86 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/22/14 ordering plaintiff's motion for a settlement conference 63 is denied. Plaintiff's motions for an extension of time to conduct discovery 64 , 72 are denied. Plaintiff's m otion to compel 65 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for the issuance of subpoenas 68 is denied without prejudice to renewal of the request after the court rules on defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's motions for app ointment of counsel 70 , 71 , 78 and 81 are denied. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment 83 , 85 are granted. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of service of this order in which to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 230(l). (Plummer, M) |
Filing 59 ORDER ADOPTING in full 56 Findings and Recommendations signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/23/13; DENYING AS MOOT 25 Motion to Dismiss and 30 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 42 Motion to Amend the Complaint and plaintiff's proposed [ 43] second amended complaint is deemed the operative pleading in this action; defendants Grubbs and Jaffe (Dr.) are DISMISSED from this action at plaintiff's request; plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED at plaintiff's request; defendant Dr. O'Neill is DIRECTED to file an answer in response to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims within 30 days. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 58 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/22/13 denying as unncecessary 57 plaintiff's request to hold petition in abeyance or for additional time to file a request for preliminary injunctive relief, docketed as a motion to stay. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 56 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/25/13 ORDERING plaintiff's supplement and request for injunction relief 49 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [ 53] is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion to amend 42 be granted and plaintiff's proposed second amended complaint 43 be deemed the operative pleading in this action. Defendant Dr. O'Neill's motion to dismiss 25 be denied as moot. Defendants Dr. Jaffe and Dr. Frazier-Grubbs be dismissed from this action at plaintiff's request. Defendants Dr. Jaffe and Dr. Frazier-Grubbs' motion to dismiss 30 be denied as moot. Plaintiff's state law claims be dismissed at plaintiff's request. Defendant Dr. O'Neill be directed to file an answer in response to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims within 30 days of any order adopting these findings and recommendations. Motions 25 , 30 , 42 referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 38 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/12/2012 DENYING plaintiff's 26 request for appointment of counsel; GRANTING, in part, plaintiff's 36 request for an extension of time; and plaintiff has 30 days to file and serve an opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss. (Yin, K) |
Filing 22 ORDER denying 21 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/24/12. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/27/12 denying 12 Motion for Default Judgment and granting 13 Motion for Extension of time. Plaintiff is granted 60 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/12/2012 ODERING that plaintiff's 7 motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED; plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with the concurrent CDC order; plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED; plaintiff has 30 days to file an amended complaint; the clerk to send plaintiff the form for filing a civil rights action; and plaintiff's 8 motion for default judgment is DENIED.. (Yin, K) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/10/11 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, either the $350.00 filing fee or a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with this order; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.