Alston v. City of Sacramento, et al
CD Alston |
Security Officer Scott, Supervising Sergeant on site, Security Guard Scott, Officer J. Meigr, Rick Braziel, Officer Peterson, Sacramento City Police Department, Officer Stewart and City of Sacramento |
2:2011cv02079 |
August 5, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
John A. Mendez |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/16/12 ORDERING that the hearing date of 8/22/12 on dfts' motions for sanctions is VACATED; RECOMMENDING that the 37 and 38 Motions for Sanctions be denied and that this action be dismissed. Motions referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 40 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/27/12 ORDERING that plaintiff's 39 "Motion to Request Leave", construed as a Request to Stay this action, is DENIED; the hearing on defendants' 37 , 38 Motions for Sanc tions are CONTINUED to 08/22/12 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; by 08/08/12; plaintiff shall either file a response to the motions for sanctions, file a stipulation for dismissal of this action or request that this action be dismissed without prejudice. If plaintiff files an opposition to the Motions for Sanctions, defendants may file a reply thereto by 08/15/12. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/25/12 GRANTING 34 Motion to Compel and VACATING the hearing on 5/30/12. Within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall serve defendants with her initial disclosures, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a). Plaintiff is admonished that failure to comply with this order and/or continued failures to comply with the Local Rules and/or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may result in the imposition of sanctions, including monetary sanctions and/or terminating sanctions. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/2/12 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 11/18/11 14 are ADOPTED and Plaintiff's MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER and for a Preliminary Injunction 10 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 14 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/18/11 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and for a preliminary injunction, 10 be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/5/11 ORDERING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is granted; The Clerk is directed to issue all process; 4 Motion to receive service of process of all court documents through e-mail is granted; The Cl erk shall serve this order and all future court filings on plaintiff via e-mail at liberty.justice.iv.all@gmail.com; The Clerk shall make available the following documents available for plaintiff to pick up at the courts intake counter: ten USM- 285 forms, one summons, a copy of the complaint, this courts scheduling order, and the forms providing notice of the magistrate judges availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes and the courts voluntary dispute resolution program. Plaintiff shall pick up those documents within seven days from the date this order is filed. Plaintiff shall supply to the USM within 21 days all appropriate paperwork. The Clerk to serve a copy of this order on the USM.(Matson, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.