Doane v. First Franklin Financial Corporation et al
| Gardener James Doane |
| First Franklin Financial Corporation, Summit Corporation, Home Loan Services, Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-2, First Franklin Mortgage Trust 2007-2, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., U.S. Bank, N.A. and Quality Loan Service Company |
| 2:2011cv02130 |
| August 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Fraud |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/30/12: The Clerk of Court is directed to close the file. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 06/11/12 ORDERING that defendants' 13 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with final leave to amend; the Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED and the 14 Motion to Strike (ECF No. 14) is DENIED as MOOT. Plaintiff shall not add any additional claims to any amended complaint and shall file any amended complaint within 30 days. If no such amended complaint is filed within said time period, this action will be dismissed with prejudice and without any further notice to the parties. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
