Hesselbein v. City of Elk Grove et al
Plaintiff: John Hesselbein
Defendant: City of Elk Grove, Robert Lehner, Michael Iannone and Paul Beckham
Case Number: 2:2011cv02157
Filed: August 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 120 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/23/2016 ORDERING that the action against defendants City of Elk Grove and Paul Beckham is DISMISSED with prejudice. All parties to bear its/their own attorneys' fees and costs. (Zignago, K.)
May 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/2/2016 re 109 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting New Trial, or in the alternative, Request to Certify for Interlocutory Appeal: IT IS ORDERED that (1) Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's March 9, 2016 Order be, and the same hereby is, DENIED; (2) Defendant's Motion For Certification for Interlocutory Appeal of the Court's Grant of a New Trial be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; and (3) 115 Plaintiff's Motion for Certification for Interlocutory Appeal of the Court's Denial of His Renewed Motion for Judgment As a Matter of Law be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. (Kirksey Smith, K)
March 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/16/16 ORDERING that Defendant's request to appear telephonically at the March 28, 2016, Scheduling Conference, is granted. (Becknal, R)
March 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 108 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/9/2016 re 99 Plaintiff's MOTION for NEW TRIAL: IT IS ORDERED that 99 Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for a Judgment as a Matter of Law be, and the same hereby is, DENIED; and [9 9] Plaintiffs Motion for a New Trial be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. The Clerk is instructed to vacate the 94 Judgment of 11/18/2015 and this matter is set for a Status Conference on 3/28/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb to set a new trial date. cc: Sac Ops Supvsr. (Kirksey Smith, K)
January 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 106 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/21/2016 ORDERING 99 Hearing on Motion for New Trial CONTINUED to 3/7/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Reader, L)
January 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/19/2016 DENYING 103 Defendant's Request to Appear by Telephone: Because defense counsel represents that he has a conflict on the date the motion is presently set for hearing, the hearing will be continued to a date when counsel for both sides can appear. Counsel shall accordingly contact the courtroom deputy clerk to arrange to have the matter reset for hearing on a mutually available date. (Kirksey Smith, K)
November 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 94 JUDGMENT dated *11/18/2015* signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/24/2015, in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff, pursuant to jury verdict. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
September 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/11/2015 GRANTING 48 Plaintiff's Counsel Dale K. Galipo's Request to appear by telephone at the Pretrial Conference on 9/14/2015 at 2:00 p.m. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call. (Kirksey Smith, K)
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER continuing 3/30/2015 Jury Trial to 11/9/2015 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 7. 2/5/2015 Final Pretrial Conference vacated and continued to 9/17/2015 at 2:00 p.m. in courtroom 7. Signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/13/2015. (Deutsch, S)
March 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/25/2014 CONTINUING the Jury Trial to 3/30/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; ORDERING the parties to file trial briefs by 1/22/2015; CONTINUING the Final Pretrial Conference to 2/5/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; ORDERING the parties to file a joint final pretrial conference statement by 1/15/2015; ORDERING the parties to file evidentiary or procedural motions by 1/15/2015; ORDERING the parties to file oppositions by 1/22/2015; ORDERING the parties to file replies by 1/29/2015. (Michel, G)
February 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/5/2014 ORDERING that the jury trial is VACATED and CONTINUED to 9/8/2014, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7. The parties shall file trial briefs not later than 6/26/2014. The 3/20/2 014 Final Pretrial Conference is VACATED and CONTINUED to 7/10/2014, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7. The Joint Final Pretrial Statement is due not later than 6/19/2014. Any evidentiary or procedural motions are to be filed by 6/19/2014. Oppositions must be filed by 6/26/2014 and any reply must be filed by 7/3/2014. The motions will be heard by the Court at the same time as the Final Pretrial Conference. (Zignago, K.)
January 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 1/6/14 ORDERING the Jury Trial CONTINUED to 5/12/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Trial briefs shall be filed not later than 1/9/2014. The Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 3/20/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)
July 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER to modify 16 Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/23/2013. Expert Witness Disclosure cut-off date is MOVED to 8/16/2013. (Marciel, M)
August 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER 14 signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/31/12; The non-expert discovery cut-off date currently set for October 19, 2012, be moved to January 22, 2013; The expert witness disclosure cut-off date currently set for Decem ber 19, 2012 be moved to March 19, 2013; The Dispositive Motion cut-off date currently set for April 18, 2013 be moved to July 18, 2013; The Joint Pretrial Statement currently due June 6, 2013 be due to September 6, 2013; The Final Pretrial Conferenc e currently set for June 27, 2013 at 2:00pm be moved to September 26, 2013; The deadline to file any trial briefs, currently set for June 13, 2013, be moved to September 13, 2013; The deadline to file any evidentiary or procedural motions, currently set for June 6, 2013, be moved to September 6, 2013; The deadline to file an opposition to any evidentiary or procedural motion, currently set for June 13, 2013, be moved to September 13, 2013; The deadline to file any reply in support of an evidentiary or procedural motion, currently set for June 20, 2013, be moved to September 20, 2013; and the Trial currently set for August 19, 2013 at 9:00am, be moved to December 2, 2013.(Matson, R)
January 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/18/12: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 12/19/2012. Discovery due by 10/19/2012. Dispositive Motions filed by 4/18/2013. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/27/2013 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. Jury Trial set for 8/19/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hesselbein v. City of Elk Grove et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Hesselbein
Represented By: Stewart Lee Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Elk Grove
Represented By: Bruce Daniel Praet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Lehner
Represented By: Bruce Daniel Praet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Iannone
Represented By: Bruce Daniel Praet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Beckham
Represented By: Bruce Daniel Praet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?