Fuentes v. Chavez
Petitioner: Jerry Fuentes
Respondent: F.X. Chavez
Case Number: 2:2011cv02225
Filed: August 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Tuolumne
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 42 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/12/13 recommending that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
May 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 CJA 20 Appointment signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/17/12. Attorney Krista Hart added. (Meuleman, A)
November 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/14/2012 ORDERING that petitioner's 32 motion to appoint counsel and 31 motion for clarification of counsel's duties are GRANTED; counsel is now APPOINTED for all purposes in this habeas; and petitioner's traverse shall be filed on or before 12/19/2012. (Yin, K)
July 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/6/12 ORDERING that the hearing scheduled for July 19, 2012 before the undersigned is vacated; Respondents motion for an extension of time 25 is DENIED as unnecessary; Petitioners request for discovery, contained in his opposition to the motion to dismiss 24 is GRANTED; The parties shall complete discovery within 30 days of the filing date of this order; The limited appointment of counsel, as ordered in this courts March 13, 2012 order, is extended to include representation of the petitioner for the purpose of conducting discovery; The motion to dismiss, filed December 1, 2011 and re-instated May 1, 2012 9 , is VACATED without prejudice to re-filing after the completion of discovery; and respondent shall file a response to the petition within 60 days of the filing date of this order. (Dillon, M)
March 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/12/2012 ORDERING that petitioner's 16 motion for the appointment of counsel is GRANTED; the Federal Defender is APPOINTED to represent petitioner for the limited purpose of adjudicating respondent's motion to dismiss; the clerk to serve a copy of the petition and this order on David Porter; and respondent's 9 motion to dismiss is VACATED subject to automatic reinstatement upon: (1) entry of an appearance by counsel for the petitioner; and (2) the filing of respondent's notice of hearing on the motion to dismiss, pursuant to Local Rule 230(b). (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fuentes v. Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jerry Fuentes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: F.X. Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?