Wilden v. County of Yuba et al
| Billy Wilden, Sr. |
| Doug McCoy, Cindy Clark, Steve Zanaroli, Jeff Delaney, Tara Flores, County of Yuba, Yuba County Department of Administrative Services, Yuba County Human Resources and Pat Thomas |
| 2:2011cv02246 |
| August 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| John A. Mendez |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/23/12 GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR FEES. Plaintiff's Counsel David J. Collins is ORDERED to pay Sanctions to Defendants in the amount of $3,775.00. Plaintiff's Counsel is ORDERED to arrange payment or a payment schedule with Defendants' Counsel within 20 days of this order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 06/13/12 ORDERING defendants' 20 Motion for Sanctions is DENIED without prejudice. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/9/12 ORDERING that the hearing on Defendants' MOTION for SANCTIONS 20 is now SET for 6/6/2012 at 09:30 AM. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 03/01/12 ORDERING that defendants' e 10 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
