Woodson v. Masterson et al
| Maurice Woodson |
| - Masterson, K. A. Daly, D. Foston, V. Mini and Tim V. Virga |
| 2:2011cv02477 |
| September 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Morrison C. England |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/26/2012 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Maurice Woodson signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/4/2012. CDC is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance and forward to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/12/11 ORDERING that Clerk of the Court shall provide plaintiff with another copy of the in forma pauperis application used by this court; and Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a fully completed in forma pauperis application.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
