Wagner et al v. City of Stockton Police Department, et al
| Tammy Wagner and Thomas Wagner |
| Blair Ulring, Mark Berg, Jeffery Tacazon, Michelle Guthrie and City of Stockton Police Department |
| 2:2011cv02490 |
| September 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/17/17 ORDERING that this entire action be DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear his/her/its own fees and costs, including without limitation attorneys' fees, pursuant to FRCP Rule 41(a)(2). CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
34
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/27/16: Discovery due by 6/30/2016. All Pretrial motions filed by 9/7/2016. Final Pretrial Conference continued to 12/7/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Jury Trial continued to 3/7/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER 30 extending deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/13/2016. Court, having considered foregoing Stipulation of parties, and good cause appearing therefor, it is ORDERED deadline for fact Discovery, is EXTENDED to 3/30/2016. Motions to Compel Discovery must beheard no later than 3/2/2016. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/17/15 ORDERING that the Clerk reassign this case to the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan, Magistrate Judge.The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk shall bear case number 2:11-cv-02490- EFB. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge Nunley are hereby VACATED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER 23 to Protect Confidential Information signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/29/2015. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/30/15: Plaintiff's claims against Defendant City of Stockton, and Blair Ulring are hereby dismissed with prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
15
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/16/12: Discovery due by 7/23/2013. Dispositive Motions filed by 9/23/2013. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/18/2013 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. Trial set for 2/11/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/19/12 ORDERING that the Status Conference scheduled for hearing on 1/30/12 is CONTINUED to 3/26/2012 at 09:00 AM. A joint Status Report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days pr ior. To avoid dismissal, on or before 1/27/2012, Plantiffs shall file proof of service for defendant Blair Ulring or a filing with sufficient explanation why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)'s prescribed service period. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER 6 for extension of time signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 11/9/2011. Defendants shall have until 21 days after service of service of Amended Complaint to plead. The First Amended Complaint shall be filed within 15 days from Court's approval of Stipulation. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
