McIntire v. Sunrise Specialty Company
| Bryan C. McIntire |
| Sunrise Specialty Company |
| 2:2011cv02495 |
| September 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/22/13 ORDERING that Defendant is granted 14 days from the date of this order to file proper representations of the "prior art" it referenced in its briefs Cochran, "Pacific" Porcela in Ware, "Douglas" and "Old Bowl." Counsel is cautioned that the small, single-perspective, unauthenticated catalogue photographs and drawings it has already provided are not sufficient and will not be considered. The requested r epresentations should be of sufficient size for the court to compare it with the '254 drawings and plaintiff's representations. The representations should contain sufficient perspectives to allow a sensible comparison. And the representat ions should be identified in a proper way, preferably through a declaration. The filing shall contain no argument, defendant having already submitted his argument regarding the prior art. The filing shall contain only the representations and enough language to identify what images are being submitted; Plaintiff is granted fourteen (14) days from defendant's above-referenced filing to respond to that filing, plaintiff not having previously had the opportunity to respond to any proper representations of the prior art from defendant. Plaintiff's response shall not exceed 10 pages. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/21/13 GRANTING 63 defendant's motion. The substituted exhibit C offered by defendant will be considered in connection with the current motions for summary judgment. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
58
AMENDED ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/11/13: Defendant's motion for clarification 55 is GRANTED, and the hearing on this motion, scheduled for January 14, 2013, is VACATED. HEARING as to 50 Motion for Summary Judgment, 51 Motion for Summary Judgment RESCHEDULED for 2/11/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/10/13: 55 Motion for clarification is GRANTED, and the hearing on this motion, scheduled for January 14, 2013, is VACATED. HEARING as to 50 Motion for Summary Judgment, 51 Motion for Summary Judgment RESCHEDULED for 2/11/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton.(Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/9/12 ORDERING that the parties shall file Motions for Summary Judgment by 11/16/2012, and the Final Pretrial Conference and the Trial are VACATED pending resolution of the law and motion(s). (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/15/2012 ORDERING that the court issues the following CLAIM CONSTRUCTION: The ornamental design for a toilet bowl, as shown and described by US Patent D534,254 S, and its seven (7) included drawings. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/11/12 ORDERING the Clerk is directed to strike 44 Amended Reply from the docket. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER 28 to scheduling a hearing signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/24/2012. "Markman" Hearing is SET for 9/28/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK). (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/17/2012 GRANTING 20 Motion for an early Markman hearing; VACATING the Motion Hearing as to 20 Motion for an early Markman hearing set for 4/23/2012. The defendant shall notice the Markman hearing for a hearing date within 7 days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/27/12, RESCHEDULING Hearing on 20 Motion for Early Scheduling of Claim Construction Hearing to 4/23/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. The briefing schedule shall remain unchanged, with plaintiffs Reply remaining due on or before 4/2/12. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McIntire v. Sunrise Specialty Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sunrise Specialty Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bryan C. McIntire | |
| Represented By: | Loren Leslie Lunsford |
| Represented By: | Edward Jerome Wright, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
