Ingram v. Hamkar et al
Plaintiff: Tyrone Ingram
Defendant: B. Hamkar, K. Dhillon, B. Goeman, T. Thorpe, J. Gibson, M. Linggi, Bal and T. Virga
Case Number: 2:2011cv02507
Filed: September 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 65 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/21/15 RECOMMENDING that the 61 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and this matter closed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A)
July 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/10/14 ORDERING that the March 12, 2014 deadline for filing dispositive motions is vacated, and defendants shall file a summary judgment motion within 60 days from the date of this order. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF THIS DEADLINE WILL BE GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall make a notation on the docket indicating that the parties pretrial statements (ECF Nos. 51 , 53 , & 54 ) have been addressed by this order. Defendants shall serve responses to plaintiffs October 20, 2013 interrogatories within 30 days from the date of this order. Any motion to compel, if necessary, must be filed within 60 days from the date of this order.(Dillon, M)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/7/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs pretrial statement (ECF No. 51 ) is disregarded Plaintiff shall file a pretrial statement within 30 days from the date of this order. Defendants shall file a pretrial statement not later than thirty days after the filing of plaintiffs statement. (Dillon, M)
March 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/19/14 ORDERING that within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve a pretrial statement and any motions necessary to obtain the attendance of witnesses at tria l. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to file a pretrial statement in accordance with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this action. Defendants shall file a pretrial statement not later than thirty days after the filing ofplaintiffs statement. (Dillon, M)
December 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/19/2013 REQUESTING the parties to submit confidential settlement statements, no later than 30 days, as described in this order. (cc: ADR)(Yin, K)
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER denying 43 Motion to amend signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/25/13. (Plummer, M)
September 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/19/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 40 request for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/21/13 ADOPTING in full 34 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 30 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Thorpe and Hamkar for confiscating his knee brace on 1/5/11 are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Meuleman, A)
July 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/18/13 ORDERING the clerk of the court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge William B. Shubb randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' 12/28/12 motion to dismiss 30 be granted in part and that plaintiff's claims against defendants Thorpe and Hamkar for confiscating his knee brace on 1/05/11 be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and otherwise denied. MOTION to DISMISS 30 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
August 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/28/12 ORDERING that this action is dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Becknal, R)
April 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Tyrone Ingram signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/26/2012. CDC is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ingram v. Hamkar et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Ingram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. Hamkar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. Dhillon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. Goeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Thorpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Linggi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Virga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?