Johnson v. Truong et al
| Scott N. Johnson |
| Protech Roofing, LLC and Lien P. Truong |
| 2:2011cv02590 |
| September 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/3/12 ORDERING plaintiff to show cause why Protech Roofing is not a necessary and indispensable party and the removal of barriers alleged in the complaint is readily achievable in its absence, within 14 days of the entry of this order. Defendant may file a response within 7 days of plaintiff's filing, after which the matter will be submitted. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/13/12; Accordingly, the court hereby ORDERS: 1) Plaintiff shall serve Protech Roofing, LLC with the complaint within fourteen (14) days of the filing of this order; 2) Failure to serve Protech Roofing, L LC will result in its dismissal from this action; and 3) The February 16, 2012 status (pretrial scheduling) conference set in this action is hereby VACATED, to be reset as necessary after the expiration of the fourteen (14) days allotted to plaintiff by this order. IT IS SO ORDERED.(Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
