Moore v. Singh
| Maury David Moore |
| Vamil Singh |
| 2:2011cv02718 |
| October 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/21/2013 DENYING petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus; and the court DECLINES to issue a COA. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/27/12 ORDERING that Respondent is directed to file a response to Petitioners third amended habeas petition within sixty days from the date of this order. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and a copy of the third amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/21/12 ordering the motion to dismiss 12 is granted with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days in which to file a third amended petition containing only exhausted claims. The motion for a stay 13 is denied. The motion for appointment of counsel 13 is denied. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/13/2012 ORDERING that petitioner has 14 days to SHOW GOOD CAUSE why he has not yet exhausted all of his habeas claims in state court or to submit a second amended petition containing only exhaused claims; petitioner's 13 request for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/14/2011 ORDERING that petitioner's 2 request to proceed IFP is GRANTED; petitioner has 30 days to file an amended complaint, if petitioner chooses. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moore v. Singh | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Vamil Singh | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Maury David Moore | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
