Davis v. CDCR, et al
| Connor A. Davis |
| California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation, Federal Drug Administration and California County Jail |
| 2:2011cv02721 |
| October 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Colusa |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/22/12 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/3/12ORDERING the Sheriff of Colusa County to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Connor A. Davis to the clerk until the balance of $350 is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Sheriff of Colusa County. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/12/2011 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a completed affidavit to proceed ifp; the clerk to send plaintiff a new ifp application; and plaintiff shall also submit within 30 days, a certified trust account statement. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
