Stamos v. Warden - SVSP
| James George Stamos, Jr. |
| Warden - SVSP |
| 2:2011cv02722 |
| October 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Amador |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/14/2013 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/10/2013 DENYING petitioner's 68 request for court order. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/11/13 DENYING without prejudice 52 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/19/12: The motion for an extension of time is moot 42 . The motion for appointment of counsel is denied 44 . (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/21/12 ordering the first amended petition filed 12/22/11 and the petition filed in this case on 03/15/12 are dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days in which to file a second am ended petition consistent with the instructions and requirements contained in this order. The motion to copy documents into the first amended petition 28 is moot. Petitioner's 03/15/12 request for appointment of counsel 31 is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/28/12 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to refile petitioners March 15, 2012 pro se petition filed in Case No. CIV S-12-0664, together with a copy of this order, in petitioners earlier filed case, Case No. CIV S-11-2722 KJM CKD P.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/29/11 granting 20 Motion to Proceed IFP. The petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the entry of this order in which to file an amended petition. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/7/2011 ORDERING petitioner to submit, within 30 days, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee; the clerk to send petitioner an ifp form; and petitioner's 9 motion for additional time in which to submit a trust account statement is MOOT. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stamos v. Warden - SVSP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden - SVSP | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James George Stamos, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
